The house secretary Amber Rudd has retired, saying she “inadvertently misled” MPs over targets for removing unlawful immigrants.
Ms Rudd, who was due to make a Commons declaration on Monday, was under pressure to stop over the Windrush scandal.
She faced criticism over the presence of Home Office removals targets plus her knowledge of them.
Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, who had repeatedly urged Microsoft Rudd to go, said she got “done the right thing”.
Ms Abbott added that the “architect of this crisis” – Theresa Might – must come before the Commons to explain “whether she knew that will Amber Rudd was misleading Parliament and the public last week”.
On Sunday, the Protector released the full letter this had reported on a week previously, in which Ms Rudd set out the girl “ambitious but deliverable” aim to deport 10% more illegal immigrants on the “next few years” to Theresa May.
Microsoft Rudd telephoned the prime minister upon Sunday evening to tell her from the decision amid intensifying opposition needs for her to quit.
- Amber Rudd resigns: Live reaction
- What went wrong regarding Amber Rudd?
- Rudd’s resignation letter completely
- Rudd’s resignation dominates front pages
In her resignation letter , Ms Rudd said she requires “full responsibility” for the fact the girl was not aware of “information provided in order to (her) office which makes mention of targets”.
Mrs Might said she was “very sorry” to see Ms Rudd leave the house Office and she should “take excellent pride” in what she has achieved.
Ms Rudd’s heir is expected to be announced in early stages Monday morning.
Evaluation – BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg
An unavoidable resignation? Certainly there has been a mismatch between what she told MPs last week and the evidence that surfaced.
In a various time, and with a minister along with enemies, she’d likely have been on Friday.
On this occasion the Tory party was combating hard to keep her. But above the mess-ups, perhaps part of the problem was also that the was not necessarily within tune with her predecessor’s mindset on immigration – the Home Office’s most politically charged brief.
The Windrush line began when it emerged that several migrants from Commonwealth countries, who also settled in the UK from the late 1940s to the 1970s, and their family members, had been declared illegal immigrants.
Reacting to the resignation, Work MP David Lammy said: “Amber Rudd resigned because she failed to know what was going on in her very own department and she had clearly dropped the confidence of her own city servants.
“The genuine issue is the hostile environment plan that caused this crisis to begin with.
“That policy should now be reviewed, and the Home Office should move quickly to compensate and give citizenship to the Windush generation. inch
The way the ‘targets’ row unfolded:
- On Wednesday Ms Rudd informed MPs investigating Windrush that there had been no removals targets
- But a good inspection report from December 2015 showed targets for voluntary transportation did exist
- Ms Rudd then admitted “local” targets intended for voluntary removals had been set
- The lady told the Commons on Thurs she had not been aware of them
- The particular Guardian then reported a 06 2017 memo from an official, replicated to Ms Rudd, that describes targets
- Ms Rudd said the lady had not seen this memo
- On Sunday night time, the Guardian published the full notice from Ms Rudd to Theresa May – which it acquired reported on a week earlier : setting out Ms Rudd’s aims to boost enforced deportations
Conservative MPs have been paying homage to their colleague. Leader of the House Andrea Leadsom called her “honest plus principled” while Communities Secretary Sajid Javid said she was a “huge talent” who would “no doubt come back in Cabinet soon”.
Foreign Secretary Boris Manley said she had done “a great job during last year’s terrorist attacks and cares deeply concerning the people she serves”.
Former chancellor George Osborne depressing it was “so sad”, adding “the government just got a bit less human”.
Meanwhile, Lib Deinem leader Vince Cable told the particular BBC: “She’s clearly jumped just before she was pushed. ”
Co-leader of the Green Celebration Caroline Lucas said Mrs Might had “lost her human protect and now looks very exposed”.
And UKIP’s former innovator Nigel Farage tweeted: “Now that will Amber Rudd has resigned we want a Home Secretary that supports Brexit. ”
- Who are the Windrush era?
- Windrush pledges ‘must be written directly into law’
- Reality Check: Has the ‘hostile environment’ worked?
Giving proof to the Home Affairs Select Panel last week, Ms Rudd said there was no removals targets for unlawful immigrants.
She later on admitted “local” targets for non-reflex removals had been set, but informed the Commons on Thursday the girl had not been aware of them.
But the Protector reported a June 2017 memo from an official, copied to Microsoft Rudd, that refers to targets.
The newspaper also released a letter, from January 2017, where Ms Rudd tells Theresa May about plans to restructure her department and increase transportation “over the next few years”.
Ms Rudd’s aim of raising “enforced deportations” would not have impacted Windrush migrants, as they were endangered with “voluntary departure”.
The term “voluntary” describes the technique of departure rather than the choice of whether to depart – those leaving behind in this way are able to approach the Home Workplace for financial assistance with travel expenses.
Job made ‘doubly difficult’
Analysis simply by BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw
With responsibility for immigration, counter-terrorism and policing, the job of house secretary is one of the toughest in federal government. During one period under Work, there were six home secretaries within eight years.
But Amber Rudd’s job has been made doubly difficult because the lady was following Theresa May, who would survived in the post for more compared to six years and had set in teach a series of plans and objectives that will Ms Rudd was expected to stay with, even if she disagreed with them.
The former energy admin was unable to put her stamps on any significant policy throughout her 21 months at the Office at home; much of her time was invested fire-fighting – dealing with the ramifications of Brexit, the rise in chaotic crime and last year’s fear attacks.
Presentationally, Amber Rudd was impressive. Yet she lacked a command from the detail, which her predecessor got mastered, and it proved to be her undoing.