Direct anger at Uber, says London mayor

Image copyright Reuters
Image caption Several 3. 5 million passengers plus 40, 000 drivers use the Above all app in London

London Mayor Sadiq Khan says anger from clients and drivers over Uber dropping its licence should be directed at the organization.

More than 500, 1000 people have signed a petition, began by Uber, to urge Transportation for London (TfL) to invert its decision not to renew the particular licence.

TFL stated Uber could not hold a private employ operator licence on the grounds of “public basic safety and security”.

The particular ride-hailing app firm said it might appeal against TfL’s decision.

The petition says: “If this decision stands, it will place more than 40, 000 licensed motorists out of work and deprive millions of Londoners of a convenient and affordable type of transport. ”

TfL’s concerns include Uber’s approach to undertaking background checks on drivers and confirming serious criminal offences.

Uber’s licence is due to run out on 30 September.

It has 21 days to attractiveness and can continue to operate while any kind of appeals are ongoing.

Reacting to the petition reaching greater than 500, 000 signatures, Mr Khan said: “I know that Uber has turned into a popular service for many Londoners : but it would be wrong for TfL to licence Uber if there was clearly any way this could pose a danger to Londoners’ safety or safety.

“As mayor associated with London I welcome innovative new businesses that help Londoners by providing a much better and more affordable service – yet providing an innovative service is not a reason for not following the rules. ”

Mass media playback is unsupported on your gadget

Media caption Drivers and passengers react to information that Uber’s licence in London is going to be revoked

Fred Jones, Uber’s UNITED KINGDOM head of cities, said the particular mayor and TfL had “caved to pressure from a small number of people and groups that want to protect this self-destruction and reduce consumer choice and competitors from London”.

He or she said the company had operated working in london for five-and-a-half years, during which it had been audited by TfL.

“The last time these people audited us to check we were actively playing by the rules, they found there were zero errors in our procedures.

“This was among the strange things around the TfL observe yesterday is they are the ones that do all of the checks and permit the drivers. ”

He said when a driver registered to the app, Uber made sure that they had all the correct paperwork from TfL and that Uber did not carry out background record checks itself.

In a information to staff, Uber’s chief executive Dara Khosrowshahi said: “It’s worth analyzing how we got here. The truth is there is a high cost to a bad status.

“It really issues what people think of us. ”

‘Knew the rules’

Kajal Odedra, UNITED KINGDOM director at Change. org, mentioned it was “the fastest growing request we’ve seen in the UK this year”.

“The speed which this grew shows how effective online campaigning can be. ”

She said the request showed how quickly the sounds of citizens could become section of the debate between governments and companies.

Petitioner Glenn Gathercole, from London, said he or she added his signature because: “Uber provides a much-needed alternative to minicabs plus black cabs. It is more efficient, more secure and economical than the alternatives. inch

Uber reaction around England

  • Brighton: Local MP Caroline Lucas said Uber’s business model had been “irresponsible to the core” and that this needed to improve passenger safety in order that it could get its licence back
  • Bristol: The city council says it would “keep an eye on the outcome” of the argument with TfL
  • Cambridge: The authorities will “look closely” when it comes to restore Uber’s current licence which will terminate in December, reports Cambridge News
  • Manchester: Uber Britania : a separate company to Uber Greater london – is licensed until 2021
  • Nottingham: Uber has a licence till 2020, and the council has “no intention” to review it any previously
  • Woking: The borough council states it follows different licensing procedures to TfL and has brought in a brand new strict criminal convictions policy

And Twitter user @Gabbysalaza_ stated she was “annoyed” at the decision as Uber permitted her to get out of “uncomfy” circumstances if out at night.

Others have said that the judgment was within the company’s control.

Image copyright PENNSYLVANIA
Image caption In 2015, hundreds of black taxi drivers held a protest towards Uber

“Uber knew the rules. TFL inquired them to comply with the rules. Uber declined. What is TFL supposed to do? ” mentioned political commentator Owen Jones .

Danielle Louise‏ wrote on Tweets : “Londoners are literally a lot more outraged at the loss of Uber compared to fact women are being sexually attacked in fake taxis. ”

‘London is closed’

Conservative MP plus minister for London Greg Fingers said, while the company must deal with safety concerns, Mr Khan had been threatening to leave users “stranded” and put thousands out of work.

Uber has said the move “would show the world that, far from getting open, London is closed in order to innovative companies”.

Yet Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn stated TfL was there to “protect all of us and I think they are doing the correct thing”.

Analysis: From BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones

Throughout its brief, tempestuous life, Uber has clashed with regulators around the world – and much more often than not it has turn out on top.

The tactic has often been to get to a city, break a few guidelines, and then apologise when it’s rapped on the knuckles. Some regulators have supported down, others have run the organization out of town.

Working in london, despite protests from angry taxi cab drivers, the company has had a relatively simple ride until now.

Yet a wave of bad promotion about its corporate culture, the lax attitude to checks upon its drivers and its treatment of this particular freelance army seems to have spurred TfL into action.

Create no mistake, Uber will use every single legal avenue to fight this particular ban. It will argue that consumers, within the shape of the millions of mainly youthful Londoners who rely on its company, will be seriously let down if it cannot operate.

However the courts will have to balance that using the serious concerns about public security raised by TfL.

Some 3. five million passengers and 40, 500 drivers use the Uber app working in london.

Wes Streeting, seat of the All Party Parliamentary Team on Taxis, says the fault lies with Uber for not adopting the rules.

“You are not able to have a situation where, however large the customer base or however huge the driver base, an operator which providing a service like this in a town like ours can simply flout regulations and on things as serious because criminal records checks for their own motorists, and this goes to the heart of traveler safety. ”

Uber controversies

Related Topics