Put aside the authoritarian — but ultimately empty — risk about taking away the media’s “credentials, ” and focus instead about this sentence: “91% of the Network Information about me is negative (Fake). ”
Trump, I think, is referring to the 2017 study by the conservative Media Analysis Center
which stated that 91% of the nightly information coverage on the president was unfavorable.
But , that isn’t (really) the point here. The point could be summed up in these two phrases from Trump: “negative (Fake). inch
To Trump, those words mean the same thing. Damaging news coverage is fake information. Fake news is negative information coverage.
This really is, of course , not true. Negative news insurance coverage — or, seen more precisely through the Trump lens, media insurance that he feels is not sufficiently advantageous to him — is not, simply by definition, fake. Fake news is definitely made-up news. It’s not based in conventional reporting values like facts plus sourcing. It’s not “news” at all.
(Sidebar: The press — me included — does make a few mistakes. We’re human. When it happens, all of us publicly correct the record. Trump seizes on those mistakes since incontrovertible evidence that the media is definitely hopelessly fake. That would be like stating a person who got into one incident in 25 years of driving was obviously a terrible and dangerous driver — a drastic overstatement designed to score factors with people already primed to believe the particular exaggeration. )
Trump either doesn’t understand or even ignores the difference between a story he or she doesn’t like and one that is not accurate. He conflates the two for their own political purposes — knowing their base hates the media and it is more than ready to believe that journalists are prepared to make up stories just to make Trump look bad.
Time and time again, Trump’s claims about “fake news” have been debunked. What this individual calls fake news isn’t artificial at all. It’s true — he or she just doesn’t like to read about this because it paints him as fallible, and he hates that.
Here’s how Factcheck. org, a nonpartisan fact-checking procedure at the Annenberg Public Policy Middle, described Trump’s approach to “fake news” in a detailed debunking of the concept headlined “Trump’s Phony ‘Fake News’ Claims”
President Donald Trump often dismisses news stories or media stores that he doesn’t like as “fake news. ” How often? The database of his public comments contains 320 references last year in order to “fake news. ”
Usually, may general complaint about news protection — such as his Christmas Event tweet: “The Fake News will not talk about how Big and how Strong our own BASE is. ”
But there are occasions, too, when he has labeled precise news reporting as “fake news” or spread false information themself, while at the same time accusing the media to be “fake” or “dishonest. ”
Here’s the issue: Trump’s attacks on the media — as flawed and dishonest because they are — are working. More than four in 10 people in a Gallup vote
earlier this year could not title a single objective news source. Nearly eight in 10 (77%) within a Monmouth University poll
launched last month said TV plus print media report “fake information. ” That’s a 14-point bump from your number of people who said the same this past year.
The press is not blameless in all of this. When i noted above, we do make errors. We have made major strides within transparency but need to do even more to exhibit our work to people. The more open up we are about how we do our own jobs, the better chance we have associated with convincing people that our most basic dedication is to getting stories right, not really pushing some sort of imagined ideological plan.
But , it is also important for people to understand what’s at the rear of Trump’s aggressive anti-media campaign. Trump is about Trump. He calls press “fake news” because the coverage associated with him isn’t as positive as he want.
Accomplish this experiment going forward. Every time Trump states or tweets the words “fake information, ” sub in the words “bad for me. ” It’s revealing. Informative. And true.