The particular Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been awarded 100, 000 pounds (£ 92, 000) in problems after a French magazine printed nude pictures of Catherine.
A French court ruled the particular images used by Closer – accepted as the couple holidayed in Provence five years ago – had been a good invasion of their privacy.
The royals will contribute the funds to charity, the particular BBC understands.
The judge fined Closer magazine’s editor and owner 45, 1000 euros – the maximum amount allowed.
The damages — 50, 000 euros to every royal – fall short of the 1 ) 6 million euros (£ one 5m) sought by lawyers designed for Prince William and Catherine.
Long-lens images of Catherine sunbathing on a terrace were released on the front and inside webpages of the Closer publication – that is separate to the UK’s Closer mag – in 2012.
Presiding judge Florence Lasserre-Jeannin also advised regional newspaper La Provence, which usually printed images of the duchess within her swimwear, to pay 3, 500 euros in damages during the listening to at the Tribunal de Grande Example de Nanterre.
The statement from Kensington Palace mentioned: “This incident was a serious infringement of privacy, and their Regal Highnesses felt it essential to go after all legal remedies.
“They wished to make the point highly that this kind of unjustified intrusion must not happen. ”
- Royal baby: Duchess of Cambridge expecting third kid
- Pregnancy’s had an anxious start – knight in shining armor
- Meghan Markle: ‘Prince Harry and I have been in love’
- ‘I’m proud to be a paparazzi photographer’
The judgement follows the particular trial of six people, which includes photographers and the former editor associated with Closer, which began in May.
All six defendants had been convicted of charges relating to the particular taking and publication of the pictures.
The statement from Prince William has been read at the trial in May.
The duke said: “The clandestine way in which these photographs had been taken was particularly shocking in order to us as it breached our personal privacy. ”
The attack of privacy was ” all the more painful ” given the experience of their mother, Princess Diana, with the paparazzi, he added.
By BBC Paris Reporter Hugh Schofield
The guilty verdict was definitely not a surprise. It’s almost a game these types of magazine play. They get the penalties but they think it’s worth it : they get the extra sales in the photographs they publish.
What was interesting about this situation was that the royal couple plus their lawyers here were pressing for a much, much larger amount within damages. They were, in effect, saying the particular royal couple is different.
There was an attempt to turn this particular into a different kind of affair, one particular in which there would be almost punitive problems awarded against Closer magazine, problems that would really inhibit and prevent it from doing a similar kind of thing in the future.
In the end, though the damages are considerable, they are not really out of line along with similar cases in the past.
They aren’t precedent-setting kind of problems which would really act as a prevention to Closer magazine and others enjoy it in the future.
Ernesto Mauri, 70, leader of publishing group Mondadori, which usually produces Closer, and Laurence Pieau, 51, editor of the magazine within France, were fined 45, 500 euros each for their role within the invasion of privacy.
Agency photographers Cyril Moreau plus Dominique Jacovides, who had refused taking the topless photographs, were informed to each pay 10, 500 euros.
Marc Auburtin, 57, who was La Provence’s submitting director at the time, and the paper’s professional photographer, Valerie Suau, 53, were every given suspended fines.
The duke and duchess released their legal proceedings in 2012 and also a court in Paris banned Nearer from printing any further images.