Government loses key Brexit bill vote

Media play-back is unsupported on your device

Media caption There was cheers from the opposition benches since the result was announced

The federal government has been narrowly defeated in a crucial vote on its Brexit expenses after a rebellion by 11 Tory MPs.

In a whack to Prime Minister Theresa Might, MPs voted to give Parliament the best guarantee of a vote on the last Brexit deal struck with Brussels.

The government had contended this would jeopardise its chances of providing a smooth departure from the EU.

Despite a last-minute make an effort to offer concessions to rebels, a good amendment to the bill was supported by 309 to 305.

Ministers said the “minor setback” would not prevent the UK causing the EU in 2019.

Of the Conservative MPs who also voted against the government, eight are usually former ministers.

One of these, Stephen Hammond, was sacked since Conservative vice chairman in the consequences of the vote.

“Tonight I put country and constituency before party and voted along with my principles to give Parliament the meaningful vote, ” he messaged.

The government said it had been “disappointed” at losing – the first defeat on Brexit : despite the “strong assurances” it acquired offered.

Labour innovator Jeremy Corbyn said the beat was “a humiliating loss of authority” for Mrs May on the event of an EU summit where commanders will discuss Brexit.

What does it mean?

BBC political publisher Laura Kuenssberg

It’s the first time that Theresa Might has been defeated on her own company in the Commons. She has to front side up in Brussels tomorrow along with other EU leaders only hours right after an embarrassing loss in Parliament.

Beyond the red people in government tonight, does it actually matter? Ministers tonight are separated on that. Two cabinet ministers have told me while it’s unsatisfactory it doesn’t really matter in the huge picture.

It’s definitely true that the Tory party is really divided over how we leave the particular EU that the Parliamentary process had been always going to be very, quite choppy.

But an additional minister told me the defeat can be “bad for Brexit” and has been openly frustrated and worried about their own colleagues’ behaviour.

Read the rest of Laura’s blog

Conservative MPs clash

Image copyright House of Commons
Image caption During the debate Conservative MPs through both sides of the Brexit discussion clashed

The defeat came after resistance parties joined forces with Traditional rebels during a heated debate within the Chamber on the amendment.

Critics accused those behind the particular amendment – which was authored simply by former attorney general Dominic Cry and championed by other pro-Remain campaigners – of trying to “frustrate” Brexit and tying the government’s hands.

After the outcome was announced, one of the rebels, previous cabinet minister Nicky Morgan, messaged: “Tonight Parliament took control of the particular EU Withdrawal process. ”

But other Conservative MPs reacted angrily, with one, Nadine Dorries, saying the rebels ought to be deselected.

The Tory rebels had been Mr Grieve, Heidi Allen, Tobey maguire Clarke, Jonathan Djanogly, Stephen Hammond, Sir Oliver Heald, Nicky Morgan, Bob Neill, Antoinette Sandbach, Ould – Soubry and Sarah Wollaston.

Another Conservative MP, David Stevenson, abstained by voting both in lobbies.

Two Work MPs, Frank Field and Kate Hoey, voted with the government.

What the vote involved

Media playback is unsupported on the device

Media caption Is it game over regarding Brexit?

The UK is due to leave the particular EU in March 2019, plus negotiations are taking place on what their own relationship will be like in the future.

The EU Withdrawal Expenses is a key part of the government’s quit strategy.

Its results include ending the supremacy associated with EU law and copying current EU law into UK regulation, so that the same rules and regulations apply upon Brexit day.

MPs have been making hundreds of attempts to alter its wording – but this is actually the first time one has succeeded.

Unless the government manages to overturn it further down the line, it means a brand new Act of Parliament will have to be handed before ministers can implement the particular withdrawal deal struck with Brussels.

Ministers had produced several efforts to placate the particular Conservative rebels, and argued that will Mr Grieve’s amendment would place unnecessary time pressure on the govt if talks with the EU ongoing until the last minute.

That they had already promised a vote over the final deal and to enshrine the particular withdrawal agreement in an Act associated with Parliament.

But experts demanded a guarantee of a “meaningful vote” before the deal is agreed. Someone said the wording of the bill will allow ministers to bypass Parliament within implementing what is agreed with Brussels.

And minutes prior to the vote, they offered a last-minute promise of action at a later on stage of the bill’s journey by means of Parliament.

Some Very conservative said this had changed their own minds but Mr Grieve mentioned it was “too late”.

The reaction

Talking afterwards, the government said: “We are usually disappointed that Parliament has the very best for this amendment despite the strong guarantees that we have set out.

“We are as clear since ever that this bill, and the capabilities within it, are essential.

“This amendment does not avoid us from preparing our law book for exit day. We are going to now determine whether further changes are essential to the Bill to ensure it fulfils its vital purpose. ”

Justice Minister Dominic Raab said the defeat would not endure the Brexit process.

“It’s a setback but may fairly minor setback, it won’t anger the Brexit process, ” this individual said, adding: “It’s not going to quit us leaving the EU within March 2019. ”

Mr Corbyn said “Parliament provides asserted itself” amid a “power grab” by the prime minister.

The European Parliament’s main Brexit co-ordinator Guy Verhofstadt messaged: “British Parliament takes back manage. European and British Parliament collectively will decide on the final agreement. Passions of the citizens will prevail more than narrow party politics. A good day time for democracy. ”