Prime Minister Theresa May has apologised to Caribbean leaders over the Windrush generation controversy, at a Downing Street meeting.
The girl said she was “genuinely sorry” about the anxiety caused by the Home Workplace threatening the children of Commonwealth people with deportation.
The united kingdom government “valued” the contribution that they had made, she said, and they a new right to stay in the UK.
It comes amid reports some continue to be facing deportation.
The particular deportation of one man, which have been due to take place on Wednesday, continues to be halted following an intervention simply by Labour MP David Lammy.
The Tottenham MP stated the mother of 35-year-old Mozi Haynes got in touch saying her child was due to be removed from the nation after two failed applications to remain.
- Who are the Windrush generation?
- ‘A headache, and it’s not over yet’
- Reality Examine: Could you prove you’ve been residing in the UK?
- UK makes Commonwealth education aid pledge
Mr Lammy later tweeted that he had been contacted by Immigration Minister Caroline Nokes, who had said that Mr Haynes would not now be deported on Wednesday and his case was “being reviewed”.
The Tottenham MP, who has called the controversy a “national disgrace, ” urged the children of the Windrush generation facing deportation to contact him, promising “justice will undoubtedly be done”.
Mr Lammy said that of 12, 056 deportations in 2015, 901 were over 50 years of age. and 303 were to Jamaica. He is contacting the Home Office to review all such cases since 2014 to “ensure no wrongful detentions have taken place”.
The Home Office said it was making efforts to talk with Mr Haynes to advise him that there is no requirement for him to leave the UK. Officials say it isn’t a Windrush case and was never an “enforced removal”.
The department said it was looking at 49 cases relating to Windrush migrants as a result of calls received on Tuesday.
A former Home Office employee has, meanwhile, told The Guardian that thousands of landing card slips recording Windrush immigrants’ arrival dates in the united kingdom were destroyed in 2010 during an office move.
The former worker, who is not named by the newspaper, said managers were warned by staff that destroying the cards would ensure it is harder to check the records of older Caribbean-born residents experiencing difficulties proving their right to remain in the united kingdom.
The federal government said the decision to “dispose of” the cards had been an “operational” one, taken by officials at the UK Border Agency, rather than the then Home Secretary Theresa May.
A Home Office spokesman said: “Registration slips provided details of a person’s date of entry, they didn’t provide any reliable evidence associated with ongoing residence in the UK or their immigration status.
“So it would be misleading and inaccurate to suggest that registration slips would therefore have a bearing on immigration cases whereby Commonwealth citizens are proving residency in the united kingdom. ”
The prime minister’s spokesman said things like school records, exam certificates, employment records and bills were seen by the Home Office as “more reliable evidence of ongoing residence”.
In her apology to Caribbean leaders, Theresa May said she wanted to “dispel any impression that my government is in a few sense clamping down on Commonwealth citizens, particularly those from the Caribbean who have built a life here”.
She said the current controversy had arisen due to new rules, introduced by her as home secretary, designed to make certain only those with the right to remain in the united kingdom could access the welfare system and the NHS.
“This has resulted in some people, through no fault of their own, now needing to be able to evidence their immigration status, ” she told the foreign ministers and leaders of 12 Caribbean nations in Downing Street.
“And the overwhelming majority of the Windrush generation do have the documents they need, but we are working hard to greatly help those who do not. ”
The PM added: “Those who arrived from the Caribbean before 1973 and lived here permanently without significant periods of time away in the last 30 years have the right to remain in the united kingdom.
“As do almost all long-term residents who arrived later on, and I don’t want anybody to stay any doubt about their directly to remain here in the United Kingdom. ”
A new taskforce and helpline has been established for those people who showed up from the Commonwealth decades ago since children but were now getting incorrectly identified as illegal immigrants.
Mrs May stated people involved in the process of establishing their own status should not be “left out of pocket” as a result and would not have to pay pertaining to documentation.
Cases possess emerged – such as these in the Guardian – of people who have dropped their jobs, rights to into the benefits and faced deportation in spite of being able to show they have paid taxes and National Insurance for decades.
Jamaica’s Prime Minister Andrew Holness mentioned he had accepted Theresa May’s apology, adding: “I believe that the right issue is being done at this time. ”
He said he failed to know how many people had been affected by the particular controversy, but it was “at least” in the hundreds.
Requested if Mrs May was the reason for the situation, he said: “I aren’t answer that question. The truth is that will she has said there has been a policy modify, that this was an unintended outcome.
“As Caribbean commanders we have to accept that in great faith. ”
He or she added that Mrs May has not been able to say “definitively” that no one had been deported as a result of issues with documents.
Timothy Harris, prime minister of St Kitts and Nevis, said: “We see this basically as the start of the dialogue, as evidence is uncovered which requires correction. ”
He said he hoped the British government would “make good any injustice” suffered by individuals, including by offering compensation.
Gaston Browne, the prime minister of Antigua and Barbuda, also backed compensation for those affected and told BBC News there should be “reprisals for individuals who dropped the ball” in the UK government.
Thousands of people arrived in the UK as children in the first wave of Commonwealth immigration 70 years ago, often on their parents’ passports.
They are known as the Windrush generation – a reference to the ship, the Empire Windrush, that brought workers from the West Indies to Britain in 1948.
Under the 1971 Immigration Act, all Commonwealth citizens already living in the UK were given indefinite leave to remain.
However, the Home Office did not keep a record of those granted leave to remain or issue any paperwork confirming it, meaning it is difficult for the individuals to now prove they are in the UK legally.
Changes to immigration law in 2012, which require people to have documentation to work, rent a property or access benefits, including healthcare, have highlighted the issue and left people fearful about their status.