May: UK cannot agree to EU Brexit draft

Media play-back is unsupported on your device

Media caption Might: I’ll make opposition to programs ‘crystal clear’ to EU

An EU proposal for the North Ireland border threatens the “constitutional integrity” of the United Kingdom, Theresa Might has said.

The EU’s set up legal agreement offers a “common regulatory area” right after Brexit on the island of Ireland in europe – in effect keeping Northern Ireland in europe in a customs union – in the event that no other solution is found.

Mrs May said “no UNITED KINGDOM prime minister could ever agree” to this.

The EUROPEAN says the “backstop” option is not really intended to “provoke” the UK.

Unveiling the draft agreement about what has proved to be a busy day time for Brexit news, EU main negotiator Michel Barnier called around the UK to come up with alternatives.

He said the text was “no surprise” and was just a legally-worded assessment of what had been decided in the negotiations so far.

What the EU’s draft document says

The EU’s 120-page paper addresses the issues which have been negotiated so far : including the UK’s financial settlement, citizens’ rights and the future of the edge between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland – which is a person in the EU – after Brexit.

On how to avoid boundary checks in Northern Ireland, the particular EU says a “backstop” is necessary in case neither of the UK’s favored solutions can be found.

Media playback can be unsupported on your device

Media caption Michel Barnier: I’m not trying to provoke anybody

This would involve an “area with out internal borders in which the free motion of goods is ensured”, covering traditions, VAT, energy, agriculture, goods as well as other sectors, across the island of Ireland in europe.

“The territory associated with Northern Ireland… shall be considered to be portion of the customs territory of the Union, inch the document says.

Other options – a UK-EU offer that means checks are not needed plus technological solutions for a “virtual” edge – will also be explored.

Mr Barnier said the record contained “concrete and realistic solutions”.

Theresa Might won’t accept it

The idea of separate customs arrangements just for Northern Ireland has provoked a good angry reaction from the Democratic Unionist Party and some Conservative MPs whom say it would effectively create a brand new border in the Irish Sea.

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions, Mrs May said she’d be making her opposition to it “crystal clear” to the EU commission.

“The draft legal textual content the commission have published might, if implemented, undermine the UK typical market and threaten the constitutional integrity of the UK by making a customs and regulatory border throughout the Irish Sea, and no UK excellent minster could ever agree to this, ” she said.

Media play-back is unsupported on your device

Media caption Can the bridge that unites the 2 villages be used to divide all of them?

The prime minister was responding to something from David Simpson of the DUP, the party that gives the government the particular Commons support it needs to earn key votes in the House of Commons.

Earlier the DUP’s Westminster leader Nigel Dodds mentioned his reaction to the publication has been one of “amazement” that the EU believed it “could possibly fly along with either us or the British government”.

“We did not depart the European Union to oversee the separation of the United Kingdom, ” he informed the BBC, adding that it will be “catastrophic” for Northern Ireland to become “cut off” from UK marketplaces.

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson suggested the row on the border was being used to keep the UNITED KINGDOM inside the customs union.

But Labour said the EU-UK government “war of words” must end.

“Theresa May’s failure to offer any viable means to fix the border in Northern Ireland in europe has come back to haunt her, inch said shadow Brexit Secretary Friend Kier Starmer.

Wasn’t all this agreed last year?

In December both sides created an agreement that Downing Street hailed as a “breakthrough” and meant the particular EU agreed to move talks to the next phase.

This included a promise to avoid the “hard border” between Northern Ireland in europe and the Republic.

However the EU says that the next stage of negotiations – which includes creating a post-Brexit transition and starting trade talks on permanent post-Brexit relations – can only progress when December’s agreement is “translated consistently into legal terms as quickly as possible”.

And doing this provides reopened the debate about the North Ireland border.

Media playback will be unsupported on your device

Media caption Would you observe if you crossed the Irish edge?

Downing Street said that general the negotiations were “progressing well”, adding that “it would be amazing at this point if we did agree on everything”.

The Irish authorities said the publication was “another important step in the Brexit negotiations”.

Ireland’s foreign matters minister Simon Coveney said the particular “backstop” option was “very a lot a default and would just apply should it prove necessary”.

Labour says it could solve the Irish border issue by entering into a new customs partnership with the EU, meaning checks aren’t needed as people and products pass between Northern Ireland as well as the Republic.

EU court and citizens’ legal rights

As well as the Irish boundary, another area of contention is the part of the European Court of Proper rights (ECJ).

The UK reports it will leave the ECJ’s legal system and regain control of its laws and regulations after Brexit.

Based on the EU’s draft document, disputes within the Brexit agreement in future yrs would be settled by a “joint committee” made up of representatives from both edges.

But the EU offers that this committee would be able to refer to the particular European Court of Justice for the binding ruling – with the EU’s court having the power to levy an excellent or suspend parts of the Brexit treaty.

The EUROPEAN is also insisting that EU people who arrive in Britain during the changeover period have the same right to remain in the country as those who arrived prior to Brexit – the UK has said these individuals should be treated differently as their “expectations” will be different.

In a brand new plan paper , the UK said individuals arriving during transition would be able to make an application for indefinite leave to remain in the UK : with their rights subject to UK legislation.

What happens following

Mr Barnier anxious that the document was a draft plus would now be circulated among the twenty-seven other EU nations and the Western european Parliament’s Brexit steering group to get revision and agreement before becoming placed on the negotiating table.

UK negotiators will work using the EU to see how December’s obligations can be translated into legal type, Theresa May said.

Attention will then soon turn to Fri, when the prime minister is to create a speech setting out the UK’s technique for the next phase of negotiations.

Key to this will be how carefully the UK seeks to stay to EUROPEAN rules in order to maintain a close investing relationship.

David Major weighs in

Previous Prime Minister Sir John Main has, meanwhile, said Conservative MPs must vote with their “own conscience” on whether to accept the final offer reached between the UK and the EUROPEAN.

In a speech working in london, he said they could decide on a brand new referendum.

Sir Ruben said “both democracy and prudence” suggest that parties should not dictate for their MPs how to vote.

Image copyright Getty Images

“Brexit is a unique choice, ” he added. “It may affect the lives of the British country for generations to come. If it flops – there will be the most terrible repercussion.

But Eurosceptic MPs were not impressed with his suggestion. Previous Tory leader Iain Duncan Jones – who rebelled on EUROPEAN votes during Sir John’s amount of time in Downing Street – told the particular BBC: “He was not a perfect minister who was too keen on totally free votes when he was presently there. ”

Backbench MEGAPIXEL Jacob Rees-Mogg said Sir Mark had been wrong on Europe previously “and he is getting it wrong again”.

Related Topics