Owner of truck with vulgar anti-Trump sticker arrested on outstanding warrant

The owner of pickup that drew attention this week due to a profane anti-Trump sticker was imprisoned in Houston on Thursday with an outstanding warrant.

Karen Fonseca had been arrested about 2 p. meters. on an outstanding fraud warrant released in August by the Rosenberg, Tx, Police Department,   Fort Flex County Sheriff’ s Office information show.

Mike Fonseca, her husband, published her $1, 500 bond Thurs night and she was released an hour afterwards, Houston’s KHOU-TV reported.

A sheriff’ t spokesman didn’t respond to a message looking for details about the warrant.

Previously, Fort Flex County Sheriff Troy Nehls threatened Fonseca using a disorderly conduct cost over the decal. However , District Attorney Ruben Healey said he didn’ to think the case would have stood upward in court because of First Change protections on free speech.

Fonseca looked after her right to keep the sticker over the vehicle.

“It’s not to cause hate or even animosity, ” Fonseca, 46, informed the Houston Chronicle. “It’s simply our freedom of speech plus we’re exercising it. ”

Fonseca mentioned the message has been on the back window of the pickup for nearly per year and it’ll stay there at the moment.

“There’s no law against freedom associated with speech, nothing in the law guide here in Texas, ” she told KHOU-TV. “I’ve been ceased numerous times, but they can’t compose me a ticket. ” 

Nehls on Wed posted a photo of the profane label on his Facebook page, threatening the particular then-unidentified Fonseca with a misdemeanor cost of disorderly conduct.

A spokeswoman for your sheriff’ s office said Thursday night that Nehls removed the article after Fonseca was identified.  

“Due to the hate messages he has already been receiving toward his wife plus children, the sheriff will not be activities on the matter further, ” the particular spokeswoman said in an email.

Lynne Rambo, a law professor at Tx A& M University specializing in Initial Amendment issues, said  Thursday  that the 1971 Supreme Court case produced two points clear: the california’s attempt to regulate profanity or municipal discourse is not a sufficient reason in order to justify restricting speech, and profane language directed at a specific person differs from vulgar content that’s generally disseminated.

“It’s state action to jeopardize as (Nehls) did and he actually ought to know First Amendment law any better than that, ” Rambo said.

Nehls said this individual supports freedom of speech yet worried that profane messages can incite others and lead to fights that would disturb the peace he is pledged to keep.

The Fort Bend Region district attorney has no plans to file fees over the sticker, KHOU reported.

The particular Associated Press contributed to this survey.