Theresa Might says the government will be “robust” in the response to a House of Lords beat which potentially gives Parliament the decisive say on Brexit.
No 10 said the particular cabinet had “strong disappointment” with all the vote, adding: “We wish for the particular bill to go through in the same way it still left the Commons. ”
Some ministers accuse peers associated with trying to “thwart the will from the people”.
But Work leader Jeremy Corbyn said: “Parliament must be sovereign on this matter plus make the final decision. ”
He said the vote proclaimed a “hugely significant moment” within the fight to ensure Parliament has a “proper role” in the Brexit negotiations and also a no-deal situation was avoided.
The amendment to the EUROPEAN Withdrawal Bill – which would provide MPs the power to stop the UK through leaving the EU without a offer, or make Theresa May go back to the negotiating table – has been approved by 335 votes to 244 on Monday night in the House associated with Lords.
After the cupboard meeting on Tuesday the PM’s official spokesman said the Lords amendment risked tying the government’s hands in negotiations with the EUROPEAN. The government will try to persuade MPs to overturn the change once the bill returns the Commons afterwards this month.
It had been one of three government defeats in the Brexit bill on the one day : bringing the total number of government beats on the EU bill to 9. It is not yet known whether some of the amendments from the Lords will be recognized by the government.
- Government defeated upon Brexit deal vote
- Brexit: All you need to find out
- Strategies for the EU Withdrawal Bill
- UK can leave customs union, insists Simply no 10
International Trade Admin Liam Fox, a leading voice within the 2016 campaign to get Britain from the EU, told BBC Radio 4’s Today: “It is not acceptable to have an unelected house to try to block the particular democratic will of the British individuals.
He stated allowing Parliament to send the prime ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) back to Brussels if MPs plus peers did not like the deal the federal government had secured with the EU became available the possibility of “delaying exit from the EUROPEAN indefinitely”.
And the accessibility to “leaving the EU without an agreement” had to be kept on the table.
He said there was the “big debate” to be had about regardless of whether an “unelected House” could “thwart the view of the British electorate”.
Analysis by the BBC’s Alex Forsyth
So far, the federal government has framed Parliament’s vote on the final Brexit deal as a kampfstark choice; take it or leave this.
The implication — if MPs reject whatever conditions are negotiated – the UK would certainly leave the EU without a offer on future relations.
But this amendment agreed by House of Lords could avoid that, by giving Parliament the power to determine what happens if MPs turn down the ultimate agreement.
The result can embolden those pushing for a better role for Parliament in the process.
The bill will go back to the Commons before anything is certainly finalised – and with some Tory peers again proving their preparedness to defy their party election with the opposition, the question is how many Traditional MPs are prepared to do the same.
And he categorically ruled out the UK in a some of form of customs marriage with the EU after Brexit, among speculation the government could be lining upward a “customs partnership” or a good EU association deal.
“No, I don’t think we can remain in the customs union for a number of factors, the main reason being that we would be in the worse position than we are nowadays, ” he told BBC Stereo 4’s Today programme.
“If we were in a customs partnership with the European Union we would have to acknowledge what the EU negotiated in terms of marketplace access to the UK without the UK working with a voice. ”
He or she added: “I don’t think there is a traditions union that could ever be appropriate. ”
The UK is a result of leave the European Union on 29 03 2019, with plans for a changeover phase until the new permanent partnership kicks in after 31 Dec 2020.
Both edges hope to negotiate the UK’s drawback agreement by this October to be able to give the UK and European Parliaments enough time to debate and election on it before the moment of reduction.
The change proposed by Conservative Viscount Hailsham would allow Parliament to determine the government’s opportunity if MPs rejected the deal or even if the UK and EU are not able to reach an agreement of any sort.
It would also provide Parliament control of the process if the laws enshrining the withdrawal treaty guaranteed by ministers was not approved by twenty nine March 2019.
The particular peer, who as Douglas Hogg was an MP for many years, informed the House of Lords the theory of parliamentary sovereignty was “fundamental to our liberties and must not be betrayed” when it came to Brexit.
“Whatever our party association, our duty as parliamentarians would be to our country and our mind, ” he said.
But former Conservative leader Master Howard said the idea of effectively offering Parliament a veto over Brexit “reveals the appalling lengths that the die-hard Remainers are prepared to visit achieve their aims”.
He told the BBC’s Every day Politics that peers were “playing with fire”.