Read the disputed memo here

(CNN) Home Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, R-California, put together this highly controversial memo, released Friday, alleging the F abused its surveillance tools.

President Jesse Trump, who decided to release the particular memo, has told friends he believes the particular memo would expose bias within the agency’s top rates and make it easier for your pet to argue the Russia investigations are usually prejudiced against him, according to 2 sources.
See the memo:
UNCLASSIFIED
Declassifed by order of the President
February 2, 2018

January eighteen, 2018
To: HPSCI Majority Members
Through: HPSCI Majority Staff
Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Take action Abuses at the Department of Proper rights and the Federal Bureau of Analysis
Purpose
This memorandum provides People an update on significant specifics relating to the
Committee’s ongoing investigation into the Section of Justice (DOJ) and Government Bureau of Investigation (FBI) plus their use of the Foreign Intelligence Monitoring Act (F ISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle. Our results, which are detailed below, 1) increase concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and F interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Monitoring Court (FISC), and 2) stand for a troubling breakdown of lawful processes established to protect the United states people from abuses related to the particular ISA process.
Investigation Update
Upon October 21, 2016, DOJ plus FBI sought and received the ISA probable cause order ( not below Title VII) authorizing electronic monitoring on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a US citizen who else served as a volunteer advisor towards the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with specifications under FISA, the application had to be initial certified by the Director or Mouthpiece Director of the FBI. It then necessary the approval of the Attorney Common, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or maybe the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for your National Security Division.
The FBI plus DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page plus three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U. S. C. § 1805(d)(1)), a FISA order on an United states citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal needs a separate finding of probable trigger. Then-Director James Comey signed 3 FISA applications in question on behalf of the particular FBI, and Deputy Director Toby McCabe signed one. Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, plus DAG Rod Rosenstein each agreed upon one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.
Due to the delicate nature of foreign intelligence action, FISA submissions (including renewals) prior to the FISC are classified. As such, the particular public’s confidence in the integrity from the FISA process depends on the court’s capability to hold the government to the highest standard— particularly as it relates to surveillance associated with American citizens. However , the rigor within protecting the rights of People in america, which is reinforced by 90-day renewal of surveillance orders, is always dependent on the government’s production towards the court of all material and appropriate facts. This should include information possibly favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the govt. In the case of Carter Page, the government got at least four independent opportunities prior to the FISC to accurately provide an information systems of the relevant facts. However , the findings indicate that, as explained below, material and relevant details was omitted.
1) The “dossier” compiled by Captain christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the particular Democratic National Committee (DNC) as well as the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an important part of the Carter Page FISA program. Steele was a longtime FBI supply who was paid over $160, 500 by the DNC and Clinton advertising campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie plus research firm Fusion GPS, to acquire derogatory information on Donald Trump’s connections to Russia.
a) Neither the initial application within October 2016, nor any of the renewal, disclose or reference the function of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or some kind of party/campaign in funding Steele’s attempts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to mature and FBI officials.
b) The initial FISA program notes Steele was working for the named U. S. person, yet does not name Fusion GPS plus principal Glenn Simpson, who was compensated by a U. S. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors had been involved with the Steele dossier). The application form does not mention Steele was eventually working on behalf of— and compensated by— the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI got separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
2) The Carter Web page FISA application also cited thoroughly a September 23, 2016, Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which usually focuses on Page’s July 2016 visit to Moscow. This article will not corroborate the Steele dossier since it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News . The Web page FISA application incorrectly assesses that will Steele did not directly provide details to Yahoo Information . Steele has admitted within British court filings that he fulfilled with Yahoo Information — and several other outlets— in September 2016 at the path of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele’s initial mass media contacts because they hosted at least one conference in Washington D. C. within 2016 with Steele and Blend GPS where this matter has been discussed.
a) Steele was suspended and then ended as an FBI source for the actual FBI defines as the most severe of violations— an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his partnership with the FBI in an October thirty, 2016, Mother Jones article simply by David Corn. Steele should have already been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other stores in September — before the Page application had been submitted to the FISC in October— but Steele improperly concealed through and lied to the FBI regarding those contacts.
b) Steele’s numerous encounters with all the media violated the cardinal principle of source handling— maintaining confidentiality— and demonstrated that Steele got become a less than reliable source for your FBI.
3) Before and after Steele was terminated being a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney Common Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely along with Deputy Attorneys General Yates plus later Rosenstein. Shortly after the political election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example , in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his emotions against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump stay away from elected and was passionate about your pet not, being president. ” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr during the time and subsequently in official F files— but not reflected in any from the Page FISA applications.
a) During this same period of time, Ohr’s wife was employed by Blend GPS to assist in the cultivation associated with opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI using of his wife’s opposition study, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The particular Ohrs’ relationship with Steele plus Fusion GPS was inexplicably hidden from the FISC.
4) According to the head of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Expenses Priestap, corroboration of the Steele file was in its “infancy” at the time of the first Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation statement conducted by an independent unit inside FBI assessed Steele’s reporting since only minimally corroborated. Yet, at the begining of January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary from the Steele dossier, even though it was— based on his June 2017 testimony— “salacious and unverified. ” While the FISA application relied on Steele’s previous record of credible reporting upon other unrelated matters, it disregarded or concealed his anti-Trump monetary and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Mouthpiece Director McCabe testified before the Panel in December 2017 that no security warrant would have been sought in the FISC without the Steele dossier info.
5) The particular Page FISA application also brings up information regarding fellow Trump advertising campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is absolutely no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy theory between Page and Papadopoulos. The particular Papadopoulos information triggered the starting of an FBI counterintelligence investigation at the end of July 2016 by FBI realtor Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel’s Office in order to FBI Human Resources for improper sms with his mistress, FBI Attorney Mack Page (no known relation to Billings Page), where they both proven a clear bias against Trump and favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect considerable discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leakages to the media, and include a meeting along with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss a good “insurance” policy against President Trump’s election.