‘Sex and the City’ star could run for NY governor

(CNN) “Sex and the City” star Cynthia Nixon appears to be considering a run with regard to governor of New York. On the “Today” display on Tuesday , she mentioned she was being encouraged to toss her hat in the ring, yet declined to say whether she would do this.

The lady should.

Nixon has been a longtime politics advocate, particularly on education problems, and served on Mayor Costs de Blasio’s advisory board for that Mayor’s Fund to Advance New York City.

Discount her in case you will as an actress out of the girl depth, but then consider that our Chief executive is a former real estate salesman plus TV host. Or take a look at this .
Nixon’s candidacy would be good for the state plus country because, for starters, we need ladies in politics.

But to be sure, it could be a long-shot bid because Nixon, who is progressive, would likely run on the particular Democratic ticket against an incumbent candidate, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who else already has a $25 million war upper body . And she may not be the only competitor: Stephanie Miner, the mayor associated with Syracuse, and Terry Gipson, an ex state legislator, are also being discussed as possible candidates.
But Nixon’s admittance into the race might also be a positive thing for Cuomo. Although he’s broadly expected to run for re-election because governor in 2018, his possible presidential ambitions for 2020 are usually no secret.

    Two powerful New York Democrats in the public, ugly spat

Many think his biggest challenge in a president bid would come from the left — not from Chief executive Donald Trump — as Cuomo has endeavored to stake out there a centrist approach to governing. Improving his messages against a high-profile contender like Nixon, likely to control interest outside New York, would be great practice for the national stage.
And fight with the formidable Cuomo would be yet one of the challenges that awaits Nixon, should she decide to seek the particular nomination. According to the Center just for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, just 24% of statewide elected officials, 24. 9% associated with state legislators and 19. 6% of members of Congress are usually female.
This is a problem, because women bring vital perspectives to politics. A recent survey by the Rutgers middle found evidence that women are more “consensual and collaborative” and more likely to function across party lines.
Our gridlocked, contentious nation needs this kind of leadership more than ever. Within New York, for example , the chest-thumping connection between Cuomo and de Blasio more than who will fix the city’s falling apart transit infrastructure provides a golden opportunity for the entrance of the calm voice of reason plus, one would hope, progress.

    Gov. Cuomo: NTSB to check into Long Island derailment

Another study of girls in Congress found that women tend to be more successful than men at obtaining federal funding for their districts.
Still, one cause women don’t tend to run intended for office is because they’re less likely compared to men to see themselves as market leaders. Analysis by the Women & Politics Institute at American University or college found that a woman with the exact same qualifications as a man is more unlikely to view herself as qualified designed for public office.
The study also found that women are usually less likely to be encouraged to run simply by others and are often overburdened along with household and child care duties, leaving behind them less time to get involved in national politics.
Plus watching the treatment Hillary Clinton plus Sarah Palin endured when they went for office confirmed some can certainly “worst fears” about the way women candidates are treated, the institute’s researchers found. Other researchers state the problem is also that women are less competing than men.
Another piece of the dilemna is gender bias. A 2016 Pew Research Center study found that the majority of Americans believe it can easier for a man to get chosen than a woman. That could be because individuals still associate leadership roles along with men. But if more women got involved with politics, that would change.
That’s why, when a woman such as Nixon is considering a candidacy, we should really, really encourage the girl to run.

Stay up to date on the most recent opinion, analysis and conversations by means of social media. Join us at Facebook/CNNOpinion and follow all of us @CNNOpinion on Twitter . We welcome your ideas and feedback.

Naturally , because there are fewer women currently within politics, female candidates are likely to possess less traditional political backgrounds. Nixon, for example , hasn’t held office prior to.
But voters should be open to the alternate viewpoints that women can bring to the table. Nixon is a mother of three that has a record of championing school change. Specifically, she has long argued that it’s wrong that school investing in poor students is significantly less than spending on richer students.
No question, in the event that Nixon runs, she needs to product her own resume by selecting a operating mate with executive experience plus knowledge of a broader array of plan issues. But she’s a smart female , she’ll study up fast, as have so many politicians prior to her.
And he or she will have to gain a nomination in the merits of her platform plus selection of a running mate. Your girl will have to build voters’ confidence within her ability to channel their worries and will have to swiftly ride the learning curve. But none of these types of challenges should deter her through seeking office.
For now, we should be encouraging Nixon fully — to run.