A winning entry within the Animals Photographer of the Year competition has been disqualified for having a taxidermy specimen.
The image, known as The Night Raider, displays an anteater moving towards the termite mound in a Brazilian book.
London’s Organic History Museum, which runs competition, says the use of stuffed animals breaches its rules.
The photographer, Marcio Cabral, refuses he faked the scene plus claims there is a witness who was along with him on the day.
Additional photographers and tourists were within the park at the same time and therefore “it will be very unlikely anyone wouldn’t see a packed animal being transported and positioned carefully in this position”, he informed BBC News.
Yet Roz Kidman Cox, the seat of judges for Wildlife Professional photographer of the Year (WPY), was demanding in her criticism.
“This disqualification should remind traders that any transgression of the guidelines and spirit of the competition can eventually be found out, ” the girl said.
The Night Raider image won the Animals In Their Atmosphere category in the 2017 WPY honours. It was taken in Emas National Park .
The eco-friendly lights are click beetles looking to lure termites into being animals with a bioluminescent display.
The anteater’s appearance had been described in the citation caption to be serendipitous – a “surprise bonus” that walked into the shot. However the Natural History Museum (NHM) states third parties recently raised worries the image was staged – how the hungry interloper is in fact a stationary model that can be seen at a visitors’ centre at an entrance to the arrange.
When notified to this possibility, the museum requested five scientists to review the successful photo and to compare it using the centre’s display model.
These experts, who integrated the NHM’s own taxidermy expert and South American mammal plus anteater researchers, worked independently of every other, but they all came to exactly the same conclusion – that the two pets were one and the same.
The scientists discovered the markings, the postures, the particular morphologies and even the positioning from the fur tufts to be just as well similar.
The particular NHM says Mr Cabral completely cooperated with the investigation, supplying ORGANIC images for inspection that were used “before” and “after” the successful scene. But none of these incorporated the anteater.
“Unfortunately, I do not have another picture of the animal because it is a long exposure associated with 30 seconds and ISO five thousand, ” Mr Cabral said.
“After the flashes had been fired, the animal left the place, therefore it was not possible to make another photograph with the animal coming out of the place which is totally dark. ”
The WPY rules suggest that “entries must not deceive the audience or attempt to misrepresent the reality associated with nature”. And it is on this basis the Night Raider has been stripped from the title and removed from display within the competition’s UK tour.
Roz Kidman Cox is a judge on WPY for more compared to 30 years. She told the BBC: “I find it disheartening and unexpected that a photographer would go to this kind of lengths to deceive the competition as well as worldwide following.
“The competition places great shop on honesty and integrity, and so on a breach of the rules is usually disrespectful to the wildlife-photography community, that is at the heart of the competition. ”
This is not the 1st time the WPY judges have had in order to disqualify a winning entry. In 2009, they will threw out the grand reward photo that supposedly depicted a crazy Spanish wolf jumping over a door .
An identical investigation concluded that the pictured pet was not wild at all, but the tame wolf from a zoo.
Ms Kidman Cox said the judges were consistently alert to the possibility that photos might be taking place but that the artifice could be very difficult to spot if the featured animals had been in a natural pose in a low-lit scene.
“The judges themselves are chosen to include a selection of skills and expertise, both natural and photographic, and are well capable to question the veracity of an picture, ” she added.
“The rules also inform you that the competition champions honest plus ethical photography, and they are translated right into a number of languages to prevent any misconception. ”
Mister Cabral describes his exclusion as being a sad decision and one he will still contest.
The particular visitors’ centre is locked during the night and has guards and so he could not need had access to the model, the particular photographer says. He intends to come back to Emas National Park later on this year to collect evidence that he thinks will exonerate him.
and follow me upon Twitter: @BBCAmos