The short answer is We don’t know.
The lengthier answer is also I don’t know — but I have a few ideas.
The first is the fact that Journal is the only mainstream press outlet with this reporting on Cohen, the payment and the private firm. (CNN has not independently confirmed the facts. ) Cohen has denied any kind of relationship between Trump and Daniels. There may be some trepidation — by media and the public — in order to dive too deeply into the tale given those twin realities.
The second is that it’s, properly, somewhat icky. A porn superstar. The President. Aliases. Odd information from Daniels’ interview with In Touch publication
, including the President’s alleged anxiety about sharks. (Side note: That concern makes total and complete sense in my opinion. Sharks are terrible. )
The third — and also to my mind, the most likely — explanation is that the American public is definitely somewhat inured to reports regarding Trump’s conduct with women.
Remember that throughout the campaign more than a dozen women arrived alleging that Trump had served inappropriately with them over the years. As do the tape in which Trump is noticed insisting he can have his method with women
as they is rich and powerful. Trump dismissed the tape as “locker room talk” and insisted all of the women making allegations against your pet were liars.
Then, he won. And, anytime issues about women making accusations against him has come up within the Trump’s presidency, his aides plus lawyers have dismissed them since yesterday’s news that voters have previously decided they either don’t believe or even don’t care about.
“The President has addressed these claims directly and denied all of these accusations, ” White House press secretary Dorothy Sanders said in December
. “And this took place long before he has been elected to be President. And the individuals of this country, at a decisive selection, supported President Trump, and we feel as if these allegations have been answered by means of that process. ”
While that contention is just not entirely true — according to exit polling
, 50% of 2016 voters declared that Trump’s treatment of women bothered all of them “a lot” — the fact continues to be that this Daniels allegation feels like many same for lots and lots of people. The response seems to be something like, “Sure, there’s one more allegation that Trump behaved terribly. What else is new? inch
While I understand that will “meh” response, I think this tale merits more than that. After all, the particular Journal is not exactly a untrustworthy media company prone to blowing points out of proportion. And its reporting can make very clear that a) Cohen produced this shell company and b) the company made a payment associated with $130, 000 to Daniels right before the election.
Unless I’ve missed it, Cohen hasn’t denied either of those 2 facts. (Denying Trump and Daniels had a relationship is not the same thing. ) So , if Cohen is around the record saying the Trump-Daniels connection is a myth, it seems to me he or she still owes an explanation of exactly why he formed the company, why he or she did so in Delaware (a state renowned for its loose laws and regulations on corporate transparency) and, most of all, why a $130, 000 transaction was made to Daniels.
Whether you like Trump or even hate him, it’s hard to believe an unexplained six-figure payment through his personal lawyer to a porno star in the runup to the political election doesn’t warrant more attention — and more answers — than our corporration currently getting.