The home secretary offers apologised for the treatment of the Windrush generation, saying it was “wrong” plus “appalling” that some face expulsion.
Many migrants who arrived from the Commonwealth years ago as children have been informed they are here illegally.
Amber Rudd said they would end up being helped to attain required documents at no cost and added she was worried her department “sometimes loses sight” of individuals.
Labour’s Jesse Lammy said it was a “day of national shame”.
The Tottenham MP said it had been “inhumane and cruel” that it acquired taken the government so long to act.
Thousands of individuals arrived in the UK as children within the first wave of Commonwealth migration 70 years ago.
These are known as the Windrush generation – the reference to the ship, the Disposition Windrush, that brought workers in the West Indies to Britain within 1948.
Beneath the 1971 Immigration Act, all Earth citizens already living in the UK received indefinite leave to remain.
However , the Home Office did not maintain a record of those granted leave to stay or issue any paperwork credit reporting it, meaning it is difficult for that individuals to now prove they may be in the UK legally.
Adjustments to immigration law in 2012, which usually requires people to have documentation to operate, rent a property or access advantages, including healthcare, has highlighted the problem and left people fearful regarding their status.
- Who are the particular Windrush generation?
- In Pictures: The Windrush generation
- Windrush peers attack Home Office
Michael Braithwaite, who moved to the united kingdom from Barbados when he has been nine, was let go from their 15-year job as a special requirements teaching assistant after his companies ruled he was an unlawful immigrant.
He or she said: “I fell to items inside. I didn’t actually display it externally until I emerged home and I sat and I cried.
“My whole life sunk right down to my feet. I was distraught. ”
Home Admin Ms Rudd confirmed new procedures to the House of Commons to assist the Windrush generation.
- A new taskforce dedicated to helping those affected
- Plans to work with departments across govt to gather evidence on behalf of immigrants — documentation for every year is usually anticipated, such as bank statements or payslips
- A pledge that all cases is going to be resolved in two weeks
- All charges for new documentation waived so individuals are not “out of pocket” : normally £ 229
- A new internet site will be set up with information and also a direct contact point
Ms Rudd also said she was “concerned that the Home Office has become too concerned along with policy and strategy, and occasionally lose sight of the individual”, however it was why she decided to work.
‘Warm words and phrases are not enough’
Whenever asked how many of the Windrush era had been deported as a result of this issue, Microsoft Rudd said she was “not aware of any person being removed” plus would have to speak to High Commissioners various Commonwealth countries to find out.
Earlier, migration minister Caroline Nokes was asked simply by ITV News in the event that any people had been deported. The lady said: “There have been some terrible situations, which as a minister possess appalled me. ”
Told by the reporter “that’s the yes”, and asked how many, the girl said: “No, I don’t know the particular numbers, but what I’m decided on do going forward is we’ll do not have more of this. ”
Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said the government should consider compensation for anybody who had been wrongly deported.
A Home Office spokeswoman declared that any people who believe they or even a family member have been wrongly deported need to get in contact so their case could be reviewed.
The best minister reversed her decision never to meet Commonwealth leaders to discuss the matter after the letter from Mr Lammy and MPs across the house. A gathering is now set for Tuesday.
London mayor Sadiq Khan said he welcomed Mrs May’s decision to meet other frontrunners, but added: “She must today go further and make an instantaneous commitment to recognise and secure the particular rights of Commonwealth citizens. inch
By Jonathan Blake, BBC politics correspondent
Any time a home secretary describes her own department’s treatment of people as “appalling” plus criticises it for “losing view of the individual”, it’s clear some thing has gone very wrong.
Amber Rudd’s admission at home of Commons that she cannot say whether any of the Windrush migrants had been wrongly deported only produced things worse.
More than one MP harked back to the particular department’s previous leadership under Theresa May. Her intention to create a “hostile environment” for illegal immigrants got led to what David Lammy known as a “day of shame” for your government.
A stable stream of stories about mishandling of cases, a minister showing up unsure about deportations and a good apparent U-turn from Number ten on a meeting with Caribbean leaders have the ability to fuelled criticism of the government.
The secretary associated with state promised to sort matters out, a special task force would certainly handle cases “sensitively” and i’m sorry were given all round.
The Immigration Observatory at Oxford University estimations there are 500, 000 people citizen in the UK who were born in a Earth country and arrived before 1971.
People created in Jamaica and other Caribbean nations are thought to be more affected than those from all other Commonwealth nations, as they were more prone to arrive on their parents’ passports with out their own ID documents.
Many have not applied for a passport in their personal name or had their migration status formalised, as they regarded by themselves as British.
The particular Protector newspaper has highlighted a number of situations of such individuals being threatened with deportation.