Cabinet ministers have agreed “on the need to consider action” in Syria to “deter the further use of chemical weapons”, Downing Street has said.
Ministers at a cabinet meeting mentioned it was “highly likely” the Assad regime was responsible for a thought chemical attack.
They agreed that the use of chemical substance weapons must not “go unchallenged”.
But Transport Minister Jo Johnson later stressed: “There continues to be no decision to take military motion at this point. ”
Simply no details of UK involvement in any army action in Syria were described in the Downing Street statement.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has accused the government of “waiting for instructions” from US Chief executive Donald Trump and said army action was unlikely to solve the problem in Syria.
This individual said: “More bombing, more eliminating, more war will not save lifetime. It will just take more lives plus spawn the war elsewhere. inch
Medical sources state dozens of people were killed, including kids, during the alleged toxic bombing from the formerly rebel-held town of Douma, in the Eastern Ghouta region.
- The ussr warns of ‘dangerous’ escalation more than Syria
- What can Western military intervention obtain?
- Syria ‘chemical attack’: What we know
President Trump spoke to the excellent minister on Thursday evening, as well as the pair agreed that Syrian Leader Bashar al-Assad had “established the pattern of dangerous behaviour with regards to the use of chemical weapons”.
A statement from Downing Road added: “They agreed to keep operating closely together on the international reaction. ”
President Trump is expected to speak to French Chief executive Emmanuel Macron about what form motion could take, with the White Home saying “no final decision has been made”.
BBC political publisher Laura Kuenssberg said it was realized the UK was planning a genuinely shared effort with the US and Italy, rather than playing a supporting function.
Sources say the particular PM is prepared to take action contrary to the Assad regime without first searching for parliamentary consent.
There have been calls from opposition events and some Conservative MPs for Parliament to have a vote beforehand.
Labour’s shadow home secretary Diane Abbott told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “It would be unreasonable for the government not to bring army action in Syria to Parliament – for Parliament to have a election…
“The reason could possibly be not doing it is they are scared they’ll lose the vote. inch
Mrs May reports “all the indications” are how the Syrian regime of president Bashar al-Assad, which denies mounting the chemical attack, was responsible for the particular alleged attack in the formerly rebel-held town of Douma.
During Thursday’s cabinet meeting known as to discuss the UK response, she referred to it as “shocking and barbaric” and said it was a “further example of the erosion of worldwide law in relation to the use of chemical weaponry, which was deeply concerning to all of us all”.
By Chris Buckler, BBC ALL OF US correspondent
The diplomatic conversations are starting to feel like part of the waiting game.
The particular White House insists that last decisions have still to be produced.
However , in their telephone call, President Trump and Mrs Might agreed it was vital action had been taken to deter President Assad’s factors from using chemical weapons.
Evidence is still being collected, but US officials are realized to have results from blood and pee samples that indicate chlorine plus a nerve agent were used in the particular Syrian town of Douma.
But they privately confess they can’t be 100% sure.
And with Russia intimidating retaliation – and warning from the risk of some kind of conflict with all the US – there is pressure to build up a wider strategy, alongside any kind of plan for military strikes.
Downing Street said the cabinet got “agreed it was vital that the usage of chemical weapons did not go unchallenged” and “on the need to take action to ease humanitarian distress and to deter the particular further use of chemical weapons by Assad regime”.
“Cabinet agreed the prime minister should always work with allies in the United States and Italy to coordinate an international response, inch the statement added.
Sir Mark Lyall Grant, national security adviser in order to Theresa May until 2017, mentioned he would advise the PM to participate with the US if a “credible plan” was put forward by its army.
He informed BBC’s Newsnight: “A very important crimson line has been crossed by the use of chemical substance weapons by the Assad regime, and, the United Kingdom, have a very strong national fascination with defending this rules-based international purchase.
“We shouldn’t simply rely on the Americans to do that for all of us. We have as strong an interest because they do. ”
Senior figures from Russian federation, which provides military support to the Syrian regime, have warned of a Ruskies response to a US attack.
On Tuesday President Jesse Trump tweeted to alert Russia that a missile attack upon Syria “will be coming”.
In a subsequent tweet upon Thursday, the US president said a trigger on Syria “could be soon or not so soon at all”.
MPs are due to go back to Westminster from the Easter recess upon Monday – and a row is certainly continuing between some MPs more than whether a vote should occur in Parliament before any action can be taken.
Conventional MP and former soldier Ashton Mercer said Mrs May a new “duty” to speak to advocate any activity and “bring the country with her”.
But this individual said it was “intellectually bankrupt” to anticipate the security services to lay out all the details they have.
Labour’s former shadow foreign ressortchef (umgangssprachlich) MP Catherine West said MPs should be recalled this weekend and become in the House of Commons on Sunday or Sunday to debate the particular “crucial issue”.
Lib Dem leader Sir Vince Cable did not rule out backing army action but he said Parliament would have to give its approval, along with conditions.