Uber stripped of London licence

Media play-back is unsupported on your device

Media caption Motorists and passengers react to news that will Uber’s licence in London will be terminated

Uber will not be issued a brand new private hire licence, Transport to get London (TfL) has said.

TfL concluded the ride-hailing app firm was not fit plus proper to hold a London personal hire operator licence.

It said it took your decision on the grounds of “public safety and security implications”.

Confirming it would appeal contrary to the decision, Uber said it demonstrated the world “far from being open up, London is closed to revolutionary companies”.

TfL’s problems include Uber’s approach to carrying out background record checks on drivers and reporting severe criminal offences.

What does the ruling suggest?

Seven things Londoners may miss if Uber goes

Now what next for Uberisation?

Your views: Uber Greater london loses licence

Uber’s current licence is due to operate until 30 September.

It has 21 days to attractiveness against TfL’s decision and can continue to keep operate while any appeals are usually ongoing.

Some three or more. 5 million passengers and forty, 000 drivers use the Uber application in London.

Gran of London Sadiq Khan mentioned: “I fully support TfL’s choice – it would be wrong if TfL continued to license Uber when there is any way that this could pose the threat to Londoners’ safety and security. inch

Image copyright PENNSYLVANIA
Image caption Taxi drivers have been campaigning towards Uber, such as engaging in this “go slow” protest in 2014

Fred Jones, head of cities for Above all across the UK and Ireland, informed the BBC Uber drivers needed to pass the same safety checks because black cab and mini taxi drivers in London.

Presently there had been growing speculation that the application could be banned from London.

Opponents of the firm state it causes gridlocked roads and do enough to regulate its motorists.

But one motorist with Uber in London said: “I don’t think it is a fair decision. Above all offers a flexible schedule, and a every week income. ”

Uber controversies

Image copyright laws Reuters
Image caption Some 3. 5 mil passengers and 40, 000 motorists use the Uber app in London

Uber’s common manager in London Tom Elvidge mentioned: “By wanting to ban our application from the capital, Transport for Greater london and the mayor have caved into a small number of people who want to restrict customer choice.

“If this particular decision stands, it will put over 40, 000 licensed drivers unemployed and deprive Londoners of a hassle-free and affordable form of transport.

“To defend the livelihoods of all those drivers, and the customer choice of millions of Londoners who make use of our app, we intend to instantly challenge this in the courts. inch

He said Above all operated in more than 600 towns around the world, including more than 40 cities and cities in the UK.

Analysis: Through BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones

Throughout the short, tempestuous life, Uber provides clashed with regulators around the world : and more often than not they have come out on top.

Its tactic has often visited arrive in a city, break several rules, and then apologise when it’s rapped over the knuckles. Some regulators have got backed down, others have operate the company out of town.

In London, despite protests from upset taxi drivers, the company has had a comparatively easy ride until now.

But a wave of poor publicity about its corporate lifestyle, its lax attitude to inspections on its drivers and its remedying of this freelance army seems to have sparked TfL into action.

Make no mistake, Uber uses every legal avenue to battle this ban. It will argue that customers, in the shape of the millions of generally young Londoners who rely on the service, will be seriously let down if this can no longer operate.

But the courts will have to balance that will with the serious concerns about open public safety raised by TfL.

On social media, a fierce controversy has broken out over the choice.

An online petition released by Uber urging Sadiq Khan to reverse the decision to remove its London licence has been agreed upon by tens of thousands of people in the area of a few hours.

Twitter user @Gabbysalaza_ said that she was “annoyed” on the decision as Uber allowed to the girl to get out of “uncomfy” situations in case out at night.

Labour MP Wes Streeting, chairman of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Taxis, called the choice “courageous” in a tweet.

James Le Lacheur called the choice a “victory” on Twitter.

General admin of the Licensed Taxi Drivers’ Organization Steve McNamara said it was the particular “right call” not to re-license Above all in London.

“This wrong company has no place on London’s road, ” he said.

Across the world, Uber has been pushed away or denied access by nearby licensing laws.

Legislators in Darwin, in Australia’s North Territory, are debating whether to permit Uber to return after a raft associated with reforms designed to open up the ride-sharing market were announced.

Uber is currently fighting a test situation in Denmark after four in case its drivers were found to stay violation of the country’s laws needing taxi meters.

‘Devastating blow’

Jesse Leam, of London First which usually campaigns for business in the funds, said London needed to be open to brand new ideas, business and services.

He said: “This is going to be seen as a Luddite decision by a lot of Londoners and international visitors who have use Uber, and will also hit London’s reputation as a global tech centre. ”

James Farrar, chairman of the Independent Workers’ Marriage of Great Britain’s United Private Employ Drivers branch, said it was the “devastating blow” for the drivers who also now face losing their careers.

“To remove Uber of its licence after 5 years of laissez-faire regulation is a display of a systemic failure at TfL, ” he said.

Related Topics